Ubuntu Download For Mac Pro
Single Boot (Ubuntu as sole OS) WARNING: The instructions below will erase OS X from your Mac Pro.Make a backup of your data and have a copy of the OS X installation media handy in case something goes wrong. First-time poster, fairly long-time Ubuntu user, zero Mac experience. Trying to help a friend select a version of Ubuntu for her MacBook Pro (Intel Core2 Duo 2.53GHz chip). Having a tough time finding a version to download and my Google-fu is failing me. This is the Ubuntu equivalent of the Software Update in Mac OS X. By default, Ubuntu wants to download and install all software updates made since the distribution was first shipped. What is different about the Mac ISO image? It takes relatively longer to boot Ubuntu on a Mac? First rEFIt and then Grub2. Need to install Ubuntu 12.04 on a. Sep 07, 2009 How to set up Ubuntu Linux on a Mac -- it's easy and free. The download page should recognize that you're browsing from a Mac and offer the Intel Mac ISO image. Choose a download host close to. How to write a USB stick with macOS.
At that location there is an ISO image which is described as 'This image is adjusted to work properly on Mac systems.'
What specific problems on the Mac does this image address that the standard images don't? I ask because I need to know which ISO to recommend to Apple Mac users. Ios 11 beta download for mac.
fossfreedom♦4 Answers
In Ubuntu 10.10, we changed the normal amd64 CD images to dual-boot on either BIOS or UEFI systems (UEFI, 'Unified Extensible Firmware Interface', is a different kind of firmware found on many newer systems). This was done using a technique known as a 'multi-catalog' CD - it contains two boot images, and the specification says that the firmware is supposed to pick the one it can best use.
Unfortunately, even though Macs use a variant of EFI (an earlier version of what's now called UEFI), they apparently can't cope with multi-catalog CDs, and simply refuse to boot them. This left us in rather a quandary: we needed to support UEFI systems, but we didn't want to drop support for Macs either. I therefore created the amd64+mac CD images, which are exactly the same as the amd64 images except that they only support BIOS booting. Macs are happy to boot these in their BIOS emulation mode.
(In fact, the name amd64+mac is a slight misnomer, because it later turned out that some systems other than Macs suffer from a similar problem - but I felt that a more technically accurate naming such as amd64+nouefi would be more likely to confuse than enlighten.)
While I would love to return to shipping just amd64 images rather than both amd64 and amd64+mac, at the moment there is no prospect of reunifying them unless somebody figures out how to make a multi-catalog CD image that Macs can boot. If you're an expert on this, please do contact me by e-mail.
Install Ubuntu For Macbook Pro
Colin WatsonAppears to be very little between them, mostly the beginnings of EFI booting:
I've not personally had much luck with the uefi booting, so I'd probably recommend users stick to the regular amd64 releases until uefi is required. (on most models, the regular disks work fine via bootcamp's bios emulation layer)
Coming from someone who installs Ubuntu on a lot of Macs. There were supposedly some difficulties encountered by some of the people who tried to run Maverick LiveCD's on Mac computers. The EFI loader wasn't friendly with it, so the Natty version with Mac support is meant to interact better with the EFI (Mac version of a BIOS) to solve these problems. Aside from that, there isn't a signifigant difference.
I would advise trying the regular downloads first (if you can spare the bandwidth) because I find them to work great on the Macs that I have used them on. If you encounter problems trying to load up the LiveCD's, then the Mac support version is likely what you are looking for.
I believe the reason for these +mac CDs is that Macs use EFI, whereas most other computers are using a regular BIOS interface (hardware interface, not GUI). For MAC then, a different CD is needed in order to allow the system to boot.
This is also why there is bootcamp - apart from driver support; windows (at least in older versions I AFAIK) does not use EFI.